Hire a Ph.D.
The following contains information about our advanced doctoral students and recent Ph.D.'s currently on the academic job market. These students are seeking Fall 2017 positions.
If you would like more information, please contact the candidates or our Director of Ph.D. Placement, Professor Rene Rocha. A candidate’s confidential placement file consisting of curriculum vitae, unofficial transcripts, letters of recommendation, a summary of student evaluation or writing samples may be requested by a prospective employer by contacting our Graduate Program Coordinator.
Christine Bricker, American Politics
Ruoxi Du, International Relations
Yue Hu, Comparative Politics
Dissertation Title: Rebuilding the Tower of Babel: Language Policy and Political Trust in China
Brian Janssen, American Politics
Dissertation Title: Dynamic Discretion: How Political Competition Affects Bureaucratic Autonomy
Kyu Young Lee, International Relations
Sojeong Lee, International Relations
Dissertation Title: Resource Dependence and Conflict
Ray Ou Yang, Comparative Politics, International Relations
Dissertation Title: The Way to a Dominant International Currency: A Political General Theory and the Prospect of the Renminbi’s Rise
This research proposes a theory of interstate monetary security to explain what determines the international use of a currency. While recognizing the importance of economic factors, this theory illuminates how domestic political economic institutions, defensive alliances, and interstate disputes affect the inter-currency competition for superiority in the world economy. I tested this theory with my global data on confidential monetary relationships, which were obtained using an econometric estimation method, and critical historical cases. After that, I applied the theory to looking at China's currency, the renminbi (RMB). This research shows that some institutional mechanisms adopted by the Chinese Communist Party for political survival are conducive to the international use of the RMB. The RMB's rise hangs on whether China can maintain the economic development and those mechanisms.
Michael Ritter, American Politics, Comparative Politics
Dissertation Title: Accessible Voting and Political Inequality: Voting Reform Laws and Reshaping Voter Turnout in the American States
Why have state convenience voting laws had such a limited impact on voter turnout and turnout inequality? Although same-day registration (SDR) has been shown to have modest effects, data limitations have prevented us from understanding the true effects of these laws, especially on political participation of the poor. Previous research has not used large sample population data to study voting decisions over time and it does not measure the impact of multiple state voting laws simultaneously; overall election system features that include the laws and administration are have also been overlooked. A policy feedback approach is used to develop the concept of state “accessible voting systems.” This concept is proxied by historical turnout, election performance (Pew), and combinations of voting laws. Very large sample survey and population data (2016 Catalist, and 2006-2014 CCES) with millions of individuals are merged with state level data. Panel data and statistical matching (CEM) are used to develop improved models. Results show early voting, largely dismissed in the literature, increases turnout in midterm elections, and even participation by the poor. No-excuse and absentee voting also helps convert the poor into voters in presidential elections. SDR has the greatest effect in increasing overall turnout and the turnout of the poor in midterm and presidential elections. Overall election administration system features matter independently, increasing participation. The study finds state accessible voting laws have benefits for American democracy.
Desmond D. Wallace, American Politics, Methods, Political Methodology
Dissertation Title: The Diffusion of Representation
An important feature of a democratic society is the notion that the actions and decisions of elected representatives reflect their constituents’ preferences. Existing research identifies multiple ways an elected official “represents” the opinions of the public. For example, some elected officials represent their constituents’ preferences absent their personal beliefs and opinions, while other representatives choose to make decisions based on their beliefs absent the views of their constituents. Despite the proliferation in political representation research, one area that has received little attention from scholars is whether the actions of elected officials and their constituents have an influence on how representative elected officials in other jurisdictions are of their constituents. The failure to capture the non-independent features of representation leads to scholars not understanding fully the opinion-policy relationship between politicians and the public.
The goal of this project is to examine the role elected leaders’ actions, individually and collectively, have regarding the relationship elected leaders in other jurisdictions have with their constituents. Using advanced methodological approaches, I investigate whether elected officials’ actions in one jurisdiction influence the representation relationship between contemporary elected officials and their constituents in other jurisdictions and whether this influence is positive or negative. For this project, I focus exclusively on the policy-related actions of elected officials and the policy preferences of constituents. The advanced methodological techniques I utilize allow me to model the actions of an individual politician, or an entire government, as dependent on the actions of their neighbors. I find that accounting for the interdependence among representatives is crucial for understanding political representation.